I am quite dissapointed about what the VR adoption of Matterport has turned to.
All the benefits that Matterport made it a special solution (which set Matterpart apart from way cheaper standard 360°-camera and toursolutions) are completely removed from Matterport VR.
You removed the possibility of a fly-through completely, that what makes the desktop/web-browser version so special. There is absolutely NO sense of depth in VR, there is no 3D model whatsoever, no depth-sensing-transitions anymore. By just fading to black this is the same quality as with every (much cheaper) 360°-tour-solution with standard cameras.
You mentioned that your users has given feedback about "motion sickness", actually, WE are your paying users, why not let us decide (and give us the option to decide for ourselves).
There are no Mattertags whatsoever. So besides not using helpful addon informations and having no equal solution (speaking of content) between the desktop and VR version, there is also no way of using a turnaround to overcome a >200 scan solution by connecting them via Mattertags, as suggested by your staff (for the desktop), such a severe inconsistency on plattforms is inacceptable.
VR is a powerful and important feature for marketing these days (you know that, because you emphasize it in your ads, too, but the way you implemented is really low and looses all strength of Matterport.
I also think it is quite distracting to see that you decide what features are important to us and just take them out (for other reasons maybe), what is next?
I urge every user who share these thoughts to let Matterport know by adding them to this post, so they probably think twice about it.